Why? Because identifying only as Ugandan renders me rootless and culturally dislocated. It would not fully answer who I am.

“The child shall be registered immediately after birth and shall have the right from birth to a name, the right to acquire a nationality and, as far as possible, the right to know and be cared for by his or her parents.” Article 7, 1 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child stipulates:

Iteso culture, of my people, indeed, takes the naming of a child seriously.

Among Iteso, through a name one can trace their lineage, heritage and history for generations. That is the power of the name among us, Iteso.

Among Iteso a name bestows upon a child belonging and roots.

I know for sure that this is the case also among other first nations of Uganda and the wider Africa.

I am fascinated by our names. Through our names, I learn a lot about different people of the world.

And through our names I share my learning and knowledge of our ancestors.

Not to identify as Atesot, a female from Teso, the territory of Iteso, renders my name Alinga devoid of meaning. And yet in that name is where I derive pride and belonging.

By the way, being tribalistic simply means “advocating or practicing strong loyalty to one’s own tribe or social group.”

Why should this be offensive that one prides in their identity?

And so, for me, my national identity is first Atesot, then Ugandan, then African. This is the least that I can do to contribute to the fight back against the ethnocide of our first nations of Uganda.

As members of proud nations do, I am always proud and happy when my fellow Ugandans identify as among members of our respective First Nations.

Let’s Chat…

RECOMMENDED

Discover more from the Humanist view

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading